What to Do If You’re Facing an Environmental Lawsuit (or Think You Might Be)

Written By: Doug Ruhlin | Last Updated: January 13, 2026

Time to Read 16 Minutes

What to Do If You’re Facing an Environmental Lawsuit (or Think You Might Be)
22:49




A Step-by-Step Guide to Figuring Out What’s Actually Happening, Who You Need on Your Side, and What to Do Right Now

If you’re reading this, there’s a good chance you’re already dealing with something serious. Maybe you’ve been formally sued. Maybe an attorney is now involved on the other side. Or maybe a regulator has made it clear that this is no longer just a friendly warning. Either way, this is not casual territory anymore.

At this point, most business owners are asking the same questions. How bad is this? What happens next? Who do I need to call? And how much trouble am I really in? The problem is that environmental enforcement drops you into a world of laws, regulations, and processes that most people never have to think about until they’re staring straight at them.

This guide is designed for that moment. We’re going to walk through what it actually means to be facing an environmental lawsuit or enforcement action, how to tell whether you’re already in court or headed there, who should be helping you, what this typically costs in real dollars, and what outcomes realistically look like.

And if at any point you want help sorting through your specific situation, you can reach out to us here. We’ve been through this with a lot of businesses, and we’ll help you figure out what to do next without guessing or making things worse.

Table of Contents

The Fine Print Disclaimer (Without the Fine Print)

To be clear: we are are environmental consultants who live in this space every day. We work with businesses when regulators show up, when attorneys get involved, and when things start to feel very real, very fast. We see how these situations actually unfold, what helps, and what makes them worse.

You’ll see us talk about lawyers throughout this guide, because in many cases they’re an essential part of the process. You’ll also see why consultants matter so much, because fixing the underlying environmental problem is often what changes the trajectory of a case.

One important caveat: we’re not lawyers (so this shouldn't be taken as legal advice), and we're not your consultant (yet!). So take this guide as practical, real-world insight from people who’ve been around the block, not advice tailored to your specific situation.

Step 1: Are You Actually Being Sued, Or Are You “Just In Trouble"?

This distinction matters more than almost anything else, because it determines how aggressive your response needs to be and who you need involved.

A lot of businesses hear “environmental issue” or "violation" and immediately assume the worst. In reality, many situations start (and end!) well before anything ever reaches a courtroom. That said, some situations are already on a legal track whether you like it or not.

Here’s how we break it down.

Scenario 1: You’re in trouble with a regulator, but you’re not going to court (yet)

This is the most common starting point.

You received a Notice of Violation, warning letter, inspection report, or administrative order. These are enforcement tools regulators use to get you back into compliance, not to immediately drag you into court.

This usually means something basic but important is missing or wrong (often found during a regulatory inspection), such as:

  • You don’t have a required environmental plan
  • A permit is missing, expired, or incorrect
  • Your operations don’t match what your permit allows
  • Required recordkeeping, inspections, or training weren’t completed

These situations are serious, but they are usually fixable if handled correctly and quickly.

In many of these cases, you can often resolve the issue with an environmental consultant alone. The focus is on understanding the problem, fixing it at the source, documenting compliance, and showing the regulator that it’s been addressed.

That’s squarely in our wheelhouse, so if this is you - reach out to us here. Handled well, many of these issues never escalate beyond this stage.

Scenario 2: You may be headed to court, or already there

This is a different level of exposure.

You’re likely in this bucket if you received:

  • A citizen suit notice
  • A demand letter from an attorney
  • A formal complaint filed in court
  • Language explicitly referencing litigation, penalties, or injunctive relief

At this point, the risk is no longer just regulatory compliance. You’re dealing with legal strategy, liability, and formal proceedings.

If there’s a real chance this ends up in court, you want an environmental team involved early (more on that shortly). Not because you’ve already lost, but because the wrong move now can follow you for years.

Not sure which bucket you’re in?

That’s completely normal.

A lot of enforcement documents are intentionally vague, and it’s not always obvious whether you’re looking at a compliance issue or the early stages of litigation.

We help clients sort through that distinction all the time. If you want help figuring out where you stand and what level of response makes sense, start here. Knowing which bucket you’re in is the difference between fixing a problem and defending a case.

Environmental Lawsuit

Step 2: Getting Clear On What Happened, How It Happened, and Who’s Coming After You

If you’ve made it this far, there’s a good chance this isn’t hypothetical anymore. You may already be facing a lawsuit, or something that very realistically could turn into one.

Sorry. Deep breath.

Before you can decide what to do next, you need to get clear on three things: what actually happened on the ground, how it happened over time, and who is accusing you. Those three factors drive almost everything that follows.

Why Exactly Are You Being Sued?

Most environmental lawsuits start because something left your property that wasn’t supposed to, or something was done to land or water that shouldn’t have been.

That could be polluted stormwater, wastewater, sediment, fuel, chemicals, dust, or other materials. Once something migrates off-site, especially into a storm drain, creek, wetland, or groundwater, the situation changes fast. Public or shared resources bring more scrutiny, more urgency, and less tolerance for delay.

Other cases focus on land disturbance or protected areas. Wetlands impacts, erosion and sediment leaving a site, or grading and fill work that affects downstream properties tend to escalate quickly because they’re visible and easy for someone else to point to.

And then there are cases involving alleged harm or exposure. Claims that someone was exposed, injured, got sick, or had property damaged immediately raise the stakes. Even if the facts are disputed, the presence of a human impact allegation changes how seriously the case is treated.

How Did The Issue Happen?

It’s not just about what happened. It’s about how and for how long.

Regulators and attorneys will be asking whether this was a true accident, a one-time event, or something that had been happening repeatedly. They’ll want to know whether anyone knew about it, whether it was flagged internally, and whether it was fixed or ignored.

A single, unexpected incident is treated very differently than a condition that’s been ongoing for months or years. And an issue nobody knew about is viewed very differently than one that was known, tolerated, or worked around.

History matters too. If similar issues have come up before, or if there’s a record of prior violations or warnings, that changes how the current situation is viewed.

Who Is Accusing You?

Finally, you need to look hard at who is on the other side of this.

A disgruntled neighbor working with a local attorney is a very different situation than a third-party group made up of hundreds of individuals, backed by donors, experienced legal teams, and a willingness to make this a public issue. One may want a fix or compensation. The other may want leverage, precedent, or headlines.

Who is suing you affects how public this becomes, how aggressive the case is, how long it may drag on, and how much pressure you’ll feel along the way.

Environmental Consultant During Site Visit

Step 3: Getting Help - Consultants & Attorneys

At this point, it’s worth saying the uncomfortable part out loud: you are almost certainly going to need to hire someone to help you through this.

Spending money on outside help is never fun, especially when it’s unexpected. But this is where you are, and environmental issues are not something most businesses can realistically untangle on their own once enforcement is involved.

This isn’t us trying to scare you or push you to hire us specifically (though yes, we’re happy to help). It’s the reality that these situations move faster and get more expensive when people try to “figure it out as they go.” Preparing to retain experienced help is often the smartest and least painful move you can make at this stage.

And this is where roles need to be crystal clear, because misunderstanding who does what is one of the fastest ways to make an environmental issue drag on and get more expensive.

Environmental trouble usually creates two separate but connected problems:

  1. A legal problem: accusations, deadlines, enforcement language, and potential court exposure
  2. A real-world problem: something physically happening at your site that needs to be understood and stopped

Environmental attorneys and environmental consultants handle very different sides of that equation.

The Environmental Attorney's Role

If legal involvement is necessary, not just any attorney will do.

Environmental regulations live in thousands of pages of federal and state laws. They are technical, highly specific, and mostly originate at the federal level. Most attorneys do not work in this world day to day, and that matters.

A corporate attorney, financial attorney, or general business lawyer may be excellent at contracts or negotiations, but they will not know the first thing about things like improper discharges, hazardous waste generator status, or how EPA enforcement typically unfolds.

An environmental attorney does.

Their role is to handle the legal strategy and communication, including:

  • Communicating with regulators or the opposing party’s attorney
  • Managing formal responses, deadlines, and filings
  • Translating technical facts into legal arguments
  • Developing legal strategy based on the facts on the ground
  • Representing you in court if it goes there
  • Negotiating settlements, consent orders, and penalties
  • Working to minimize liability and overall fallout

What they are not going to do is lace up boots, put on a safety vest, walk your site, trace a discharge, or design physical fixes. That’s not a knock on attorneys. That’s simply not their role.

They are strategists and communicators of legal language.

The Environmental Consultant's Role

This is where we come in, and where the root problem gets solved.

Environmental consultants are the ones who deal with the issue in the real world, not just on paper. We act as translators for the layperson and doers when it comes to fixing the problem.

Consultants will:

  • Come to your facility and see the issue firsthand
  • Walk operations, storage areas, discharge points, and workflows
  • Identify what is physically causing the violation
  • Explain regulations in plain English and how they apply to your site
  • Catch you up on requirements you may not be compliant with (which looks bad in court if ignored)
  • Create a practical plan for what needs to change
  • Help stop ongoing discharges, releases, or violations
  • Prepare or update required plans and programs
  • Assist with permit applications, reporting, and agency submittals
  • Address waste generator status, waste handling, spill response materials, and training
  • Document corrective actions so there is proof the issue has been resolved

In short, the consultant makes the problem go away at its source.

Without this work, an attorney is left trying to argue a case while the underlying issue still exists, which is not a strong position to be in.

When one may be enough, and when you need both

If you’re dealing with a regulator over missing plans, permits, records, or operational compliance issues, you can often resolve the situation with just an environmental consultant, as long as it’s handled correctly and promptly.

If the situation could escalate to court, involve a citizen suit, or carry serious penalties, that’s when an environmental attorney should be brought in, supported by a consultant fixing the technical side. This is where everything clicks.

Your environmental attorney is in a far stronger position when they can say:

“The facility has retained an environmental consulting firm that has been on site, evaluated the issue, and is actively implementing corrective actions.”

And then follow up with:

“The facility’s environmental firm has corrected the issues, documented compliance, and put controls in place so this does not happen again.”

That is a very different situation than an attorney having to say:

“The facility is still trying to understand what the issue is and how to fix it.”

Regulators and courts respond to action. Proactively fixing the problem with professional, on-the-ground help makes a much stronger case than legal arguments alone.

Step 4: Immediate Steps and Damage Control

There’s usually a short period early on where your actions can either help stabilize the situation or unintentionally complicate it. The goal at this stage isn’t to fix everything immediately. It’s to avoid making things harder than they need to be while you line up the right help.

A common instinct is to start cleaning things up, rewriting procedures, or sending detailed explanations to regulators to show you’re being proactive. While well-intentioned, that approach can create confusion or inconsistencies if it happens before the full picture is understood.

Instead, focus on a few measured steps.

Start by preserving and organizing existing records and communications. Emails, reports, logs, permits, and other records should be left intact. Do not delete, change, alter, shred, or try to hide anything. Gather old permits, reports, correspondence with regulators, violations - all of it, anything that involves your environmental program - should be compiled and neatly organized.

If something is actively ongoing, stopping it where possible is reasonable. If you can shut down a piece of equipment temporarily, close a valve, or contain a spill that is part of the problem (safely!) - go ahead and do so. An issue that clearly stops once it’s identified is viewed differently than one that continues.

Be thoughtful about what you document and how. Well-meaning photos or notes taken without guidance can sometimes create more questions than answers. This is where professional input matters.

Most importantly, this is the point where it makes sense to reach out for experienced help. Contact us or another environmental consultant and talk through what’s happening. That initial conversation is often the best way to understand the scope of the issue, what needs to happen next, and whether legal counsel should be involved as well.

If there’s a real chance the situation could escalate, bringing in an environmental attorney early can be important. A consultant can help you assess that risk and coordinate next steps so the technical and legal sides stay aligned.

Environmental protest

Costs of Environmental Lawsuits

So, how much is this going to cost? Of course, it's going to totally depend on the severity of your situation.

Unfortunately, this kind of thing isn’t usually "cheap". If you're expecting to spend a couple hundred dollars to make this go away, you are sorely mistaken.

But here’s the reality check most people need to hear: getting in trouble isn’t cheap either, and it’s usually far more expensive than people expect when they try to “wait and see.”

By the time environmental enforcement enters the picture, costs are already stacking up. Fines are just one piece. Cleanup work, corrective actions, permit delays, reporting requirements, operational slowdowns or shutdowns, legal exposure, and lost management time all add up fast.

Trying to handle this yourself to “save money” is one of the most common ways we see costs spiral.

Ballpark Costs for Common Scenarios

Every situation is different, but here are realistic ranges based on what we see in the field.

Lower-end situations (roughly $5,000–$25,000+)
These are usually cases like:

  • Missing or outdated plans
  • Permits that were never obtained or need correction
  • Recordkeeping, training, or inspection gaps
  • Issues caught early with limited or no environmental impact

In these cases, the work is often focused on getting you compliant, documenting fixes, and closing things out before they escalate.

Mid-range situations (roughly $25,000–$100,000+)
This is where we see:

  • Improper discharges that need investigation and correction
  • Multiple compliance gaps across a facility
  • Regulator involvement with ongoing oversight
  • Legal counsel working alongside a consultant
  • Reporting, monitoring, and follow-up requirements

This is a very common range once enforcement is involved and the issue is more than just paperwork.

Higher-end situations ($100,000–$250,000+)
These tend to involve:

  • Environmental impacts to surface water, wetlands, or groundwater
  • Cleanup or remediation requirements
  • Citizen suits or court involvement
  • Long timelines, multiple agencies, or repeated violations
  • Operational shutdowns or major process changes

At this level, costs stack up quickly between consulting, legal fees, penalties, remediation, and lost operational time.

And yes, there are cases that go well beyond this, but by then you’re usually dealing with serious environmental harm, human exposure, or long-term noncompliance.

Why Trying to “Save Money” Often Backfires

Here’s the comparison we often use: if you were being personally accused of something serious, you probably wouldn’t say, “That lawyer is too expensive, I’ll just figure it out myself.” You’d recognize immediately that this is not the moment to be frugal or experimental.

Environmental enforcement is no different. Once you’re on the radar, delays, half-fixes, and guessing your way through regulations almost always make things worse. Regulators don’t expect perfection, but they do expect competence and action. Waiting usually just gives them more to point at.

You are where you are. This is not the time for DIY fixes or hoping it blows over. You need help from people who have been through this before and know how these situations actually play out. The only honest way to understand where you land on the cost spectrum is to start talking to the right people and getting eyes on the actual issue.

Outcomes of Environmental Lawsuits

Outcomes vary widely, and anyone promising you a guaranteed result up front is not being honest with you.

We’ve seen everything from situations that are resolved cleanly and quietly to cases that fundamentally change how a business operates, and in some instances, who is personally exposed when things go wrong.

On the best end of the spectrum, some cases are dropped entirely. That can happen when allegations don’t hold up, facts were misunderstood, impacts were overstated, or compliance issues are corrected quickly and documented properly. In those situations, businesses can successfully make the case that no further action is warranted. It does happen, but it usually requires early, professional involvement and a clear factual record.

More commonly, outcomes look like corrective action with minimal penalties. The issue is identified, fixed, documented, and the business moves forward with better controls in place. These cases tend to involve limited impact, quick response, and no evidence of ongoing or intentional noncompliance.

Many situations fall into the middle ground. That might mean negotiated settlements that require fixes, follow-up reporting, and ongoing oversight. Consent orders with audits, monitoring, and regular check-ins with regulators are common once enforcement is involved. These outcomes are manageable, but they do change how you operate and require continued attention.

On the more serious end, outcomes can include significant fines paired with operational restrictions. Certain activities may be limited, suspended, or require approval before restarting. In severe cases, parts of a facility or an entire operation may be temporarily or permanently shut down.

And while most people focus on what this means for the company, it’s important to understand that some environmental cases can extend beyond the business itself. Depending on the facts, regulators may look at who knew what, who was responsible for decisions, and whether violations were ignored or knowingly allowed to continue. In those situations, personal liability for owners, officers, or managers can come into play.

Where you land on this spectrum depends on what actually happened, how serious the impacts were, how long the issue existed, and how you respond once it’s identified. Early, professional, documented action not only improves your chances of minimizing penalties, it also gives you the best shot at having a case reduced or dismissed altogether.

Final Thoughts and Where to Get Help Now

If you’re dealing with an environmental violation or lawsuit, the goal is not to “win an argument.” It’s to protect your business, limit damage, and get through this without turning a bad situation into a worse one.

That starts with being honest about where you are. Are you facing a compliance issue that needs to be fixed, or are you already in legal territory that needs to be defended? Once you understand that, the path forward becomes clearer. Bring in the right help. Let people who deal with this every day step in. And allow the technical and legal pieces to work together instead of in isolation.

Environmental enforcement is complicated, fast-moving, and unforgiving of guesswork. Trying to muscle through it alone rarely saves money or stress. It usually just delays the inevitable and narrows your options.

If you want help understanding where you stand and what to do next, contact us here. We’ve been on this road with a lot of businesses, and we’ll help you move forward with clarity instead of crossing your fingers and hoping for the best.

Tags:

Need a hand? Let's talk.

Keep Reading

Environmental Management Systems
18 mins to read

Everything You Need to Know About Environmental Management Systems (EMS)

Becoming An EMS Expert Ever feel like you’re just crossing your fingers when it comes to environmental compliance? If you're the one responsible for SPCC plans, NPDES permits, inspections, training,...

Environmental Compliance
8 mins to read

The true cost of an environmental audit. (And a FREE pricing estimator!)

Environmental audit costs & prices are impacted by the variables at your facility. With the rise in 3rd party environmental lawsuits, and the very real threat of enforcement action at your facility...

Environmental Compliance
5 mins to read

Do I need an Environmental Audit?

Learn if & when you need an environmental audit. Environmental audits are a critical part of a company's environmental performance. But most companies still either don't do them, don't think they...

Whether you need help with a single requirement or want to hand off your entire environmental program, we get it done right, the first time. You'll feel protected, confident in your company's regulatory standing, and ready for whatever comes next.

888-RMA-0230

Copyright © Resource Management Associates